Quantcast
Channel: statism – JaysAnalysis.com
Viewing all 34 articles
Browse latest View live

The Jay Show – God’s Law or Chaos?

0
0

In this podcast, I discuss the choice of life and freedom through God’s Laws, or chaos and bondage through tyranny and oppression. Our culture is fast degenerating into total sludge. GMO food, public schools, liberalism, cults, and so on, all spring from rejecting God’s Laws.

MP3 here. 40 mins.

(right click, save as)



How to Destroy Nations: And Rule Them

0
0

The Syndicate! (From The X-Files)

By: Jay

Bored?  Restless?  Does your secret cabal need something to do more interesting than donning goofy outfits?  Well, look no further–you’ve found the infamous step by step program to destroy nations.   But wait, it gets better. Not just destroying them; you’re going to take them down, and then rule them.  So get your cabal together and let’s talk world domination.

First, your fellow society members need to be well-educated.  You need a hefty dose of the major disciplines and men (and some women) trained in the arts and sciences, with some specializing in various disciplines.  Of particular relevance will be subjects like psychology, philosophy, history, economics and the sciences.  The more “Renaissance Man” your good men are, the better.  Hopefully your cadre has some players that are also good at acting and theater, because you’re going to need to do a lot of acting, lying and mass theater.

The first thing you’ll want to do is banking, so we’re going to establish a centralized bank that used a fiat currency.  The bank is to be established under the guise of “stability,” since a centralized bank that sets the rates of interest gives the appearance of a unifying factor, and which can eventually force all markets and localized economies onto a fiat currency.  As you extend more and more loans, you will be amassing real assets, which amounts, of course, to real wealth.  It may be necessary at first to base the new economy you’re establishing on gold or something real, but this won’t be a problem, inasmuch as over time as you build capital, you can purchase the gold.  Eventually, the gold standard won’t even be necessary, as all the money will be based on non-existent digital debts. 

If you don’t have the ability or means to start a central bank in a nation, you’ll have to think more long-term. Establish smaller, simper organizations, like the now-popular fast cash and credit bureau institutions which, over many decades, can grow into large banks.  It is important that in the host nation you are taking down, you promote the new banking institutions as geared toward progress.  These banks are the perfect “capitalist” mechanisms, inasmuch as they are able to produce “profit” (ie, amass real assets), from almost no bottom line!  It is important to promote this under the guise of a “free market” and “deregulation” (which of course, doesn’t exist), and fools the masses who are still caught up in cliché systems and phrases that are now 200 years out of date.

Now that you’ve got your bank in place, you’ll need to start planning on integrating and controlling other areas of commerce and social existence.  Control is the name of the game.  What you’ll want to initially do is set up numerous private foundations that operate under the guise of philanthropy.  You’ve got a bit of wealth now, so you won’t want to run a total scam–you’ll want to build a few museums and schools, but this will work for your advantage as well, as you will be able to control the content of the worldviews you desire to present in these institutions, as we will see in the education step.  

Now that you’re a powerful private bank, you’ll want to begin to embed yourself as far as possible in the political process, and that is a key function of your foundation.  The foundations must be named things which sound nice and helpful, using terms such as “freedom,” “arts,” “democracy,” and so on.  For example, the National Foundation for Freedom and Democracy.  You’ll want to staff this foundation with easily controllable “yes men” (and women).  Bureaucratic corporate managerial types will make the perfect foundation directors.  Through the foundations, you will begin to embed yourself into the political process through lobbying politicians, and after you’ve built up your foundations enough, its members will begin to become viable candidates, as well as your banking underlings.  Another added bonus is that your private foundation will also accept donations from the morons who think you are working in their welfare.  This will work especially well with the so-called “left,” who generally worship social programs such as your foundation has now begun to help.  Whether any of these programs and forms of aid actually produce good results is irrelevant. As long as there is the facade of being a philanthropic organization, the masses won’t catch on to the scheme, inasmuch as they are stupid.

Now that you’ve begun to branch out into politics, you can have your candidates begin to pass laws that will benefit your companies.  Since you’ve amassed real wealth, you can buy off these minions and underlings. “But what if some of the underlings catch on, or decide to rebel? How do we shut them up?”  Simple–you won’t have to worry, since for the most part, you own them.  But should one or two here and there begin to buck your system, having found a “conscience” somewhere, all you need do is have dirt on them.  Remember–you didn’t recruit particularly virtuous persons into your foundations and new corporations, but people who are easily compromised that you have dirt on.  Most of the people who you have groomed will be amoral, so outing them to the press should be an easy mechanism to quell dissent within your ranks.

Next, you want to move into education and media.  These are crucial, since these are so useful for moving the masses.  You’ll want to launch your own media organizations and begin to move your way into education by donations, foundations and schools. Remember–all of this is being done under the guise of the so-called free market and a deregulated economy, where you are the engine of “jobs” for the masses.  You can now manipulate the markets since you control the currency, and as your power base expands, your goal is to branch out into other areas of social life.  Again, the game is control.  But it is crucial that all this be done under the name of democracy, since the manipulation of language is just a form of magic which bamboozles the masses, as has always been the case (since “democracy” is in no sense real, anyway).  Whether the entity is actually “democratic” or not is irrelevant. In fact, it isn’t. But humans are geared towards being gullible and accepting what they are told as reality.  Thus we simply name the institution “democratic,” and it is so.  Through the media, we can now build up and create narratives of enemies and threats to further whatever designs are needed.  Terrorism works well in homeland power grabs, as “communism,” which we fund and create as the dialectical opposite of our system, as well as “environmentalism” as a global threat as our power grows international.

Now that we’ve got our hand in education, we want to collectivize at all costs.  Over time, you must incrementally make the public school more and more like a prison–a re-education camp, where the goal is to suppress critical thinking and dissent.  “Belonging,” “tolerance” and alternative religions are key tools by which we remove their drive towards individuality.  Purposefully promote education that is not education at all. It is a form of control, but which will also operate under the guise of the “freedom” of the students to reject classical modes of education in math, arts, sciences, etc.  At all costs, the children are to be kept from classical western learning and principles. These will be the treasures of you and your cadre.  The masses will never appreciate these things, nor understand them anyway.  The danger, however, comes from the reasonable intelligent middle class children and the rare geniuses that arise.  At all costs, these groups are to be neutralized, since they pose the most threat to your designs.  Alienation, rejection and marginalization usually work well for most children, since this is a volatile age where the desire to be accepted is strongest.  Only the strongest willed and smartest ones will continue to rebel, and they are to be dealt with accordingly.  Some may even be watched for many years as potential recruits to your Organization.  For the most part, however, this tact will ensure the future generations of the middle classes pose no threat.  The upper classes will be easier, since by now, you’ve probably begin to build your own prestigious private schools and universities.  These will be allowed a greater modicum of real knowledge, but still within a very controlled paradigm.  Very, very few students will actually be able to break these paradigms due to fear of alienation.

Now it’s time to use media.  Mass media is a great way to also control the rest of the populace, and the same plan we used in the school will be used here in the mass media–including our entertainment complex.  It is important to realize that all of these entities are being weaponized.  We are creating these entities as mechanisms of control and influence, just like we did with our initial central bank.   It is again the middle class alone that possesses any possible threat, since we are here dealing with the doctors, business owners and academics, whose IQs will generally fluctuate around the 110-120 level.  They are intelligent, but they are also very much the status quo.  They represent the engine of the system, and they are the key demographic that we need to hit with all of our guns.  All of our mass media tactics of a somewhat sophisticated nature must be aimed here, since the lower classes and minorities are easily manipulated and controlled by simply believing whatever lies our schools and foundations tell them.  And we must work to pass all forms of legislation and promote only news stories which exalt these lower classes, while demonizing the middle class.

The same goes for the entertainment industry.  We promote and fund the arts that are degenerate and banal, since the arts reflect the soul of a people, and our goal is to remove the enemy nations’ soul.  We are conquering them, but not in the classical militarist form. We are thus weaponizing the culture in order to destroy family and tradition of our enemy.  This will be the crucial role the media and education will play. We will set child against parents, old against, young, middle class (portrayed as “wealthy”) against lower classes, race warfare, etc.  And we do this all through the “democratic free market.”  By blending and “washing out” all these distinct groups, erasing their history and throwing them all into a blender, we cause chaos, from which we will then pose as saviors by bringing order. Once there are chaotic events, we can make key tactical moves for power grabs, especially at the local level, where we have now begun to move our sphere of influence into the local law enforcement sectors.  Such power grabs should be done incrementally, however, as many past rulers and empires have made the mistake of grabbing power too fast, and thus ensuring their own downfall. 

Another crucial aspect of your psychological warfare technique will be the use of false dialectics, wherein we will control both sides.   We will offer two candidates, two products, two versions of news, two versions of all kinds of things.  And this dialectic doesn’t have to remain a two-pronged entity, either.  We can create three-tiered, four-tiered, and so on–as many tiers as are needed.  Of course, the more tiers we add, the more intelligent and devious individuals we will need to run them, since we are employing persons who are able to catch on to the game, so these individuals will need to be monitored, but by now we have begun to make inroads into the “intelligence” agencies of the rival nation.  We have ensconced ourselves so well, if all goes by plan, that we can rely on the principle of compartmentalization quite well.   Most individuals and professionals, even highly proficient and intelligent ones generally cannot integrate these different subjects to see how they fit together according to our designs.  The few that catch on can be easily bought or dealt with.  We have now amassed top technological capabilities (and whole companies!), so monitoring them will be quite simple, as we will withhold the most advanced technologies from the masses, and through planned obsolescence gradually increase the enslavement of the populace through degenerate art and access to simulated sex. 

This notion of simulated reality is key.  One of the most important aspects of our designs will be to promote fantasy.  Humans generally love lies, and just like Stockholm Syndrome, will eventually fall in love with their captors.  We will even, after gaining significant power, discuss this openly.   Talking openly about it in print (often in fiction) has a multi-layered psychological warfare impetus behind it.  It produces a conditioning to accept it, as well as a chilling effect when the events written and spoken about occur.  The line between fact and fiction is thus blurred, and our perceived ability to now write reality itself is thus enhanced.   We, the shadow government, can speak about our existence, but we don’t actually let our names and identities be known, per se.  Some of our men can be public, but your system will function much better if, for the most part, we remain a shadow government.  All the while the public “democratic” government is the cloak by which we rule, and the masses and middle classes will think the “presidency” and congress are their rulers.  meanwhile, we will engineer society to the goals and future which is most sensible and constitutes real progress, and the masses will not be involved to hold back the advancement.  

We have  now won this nation, and it is ours to steer as we see fit.  We may now do as we see fit with the food and water, whether we adjudge population to be slowed or stopped by covert sterilization.   But why stop here?  Our model has proven effective, and, though slight modifications will of course be made according as the needs of the new nations demand, the same basic outline works like a charm. We now take this same model and apply it worldwide.  This will take generations, but the model is foolproof.  The few who catch onto it in toto are thus a small minority and unable to effect any real change.  We control the opposition.


From Theology to Geopolitics and Economics

0
0

Oswald Spengler's classic, The Decline of the West

By: Jay

I am frustrated.  For years, I have dedicated a large portion of my time to research, and am constantly lectured by the clueless on topics of which they are clueless. This is especially true if you are in academic circles.  However, I understand that this is part of learning the world and how it works.  Nevertheless, though I spent years studying theology and religion, which was then supplemented with philosophy and history, I have branched out into espionage and tradecraft, geo-politics, race and economics.  The last few years have been spent immersing myself in those last four, and to be perfectly honest, I am particularly adept at gaining mastery of subjects very quickly.  I would in no way claim to have mastered these last four, as they are immense subjects.  Within three years, though, I have already read several key works in all four, and so I’m comfortable discussing them openly.

The point of this post is not to brag: I don’t have to. The point here is to mention that, as a remedy to frustration and as a means of growing in knowledge and interaction on more pertinent subject matter than merely films (though the film analyses will continue), I’ll be discussing new issues.  I am going to write more freely on my thoughts on a variety of issues, expanding that title “analysis.”  I do not at all profess mastery of these subjects, but I am becoming fluent in them.  On top of that, I am sick of being lectured by those who haven’t even branched out of their own narrow field of study.  All things are related, and all these subjects, as well as life experience, are interrelated.  Modern education is fragmented and no longer teaches a “worldview,” which was the whole meaning behind the word “university,” as Newman wrote.  Because all things are related, analysis should therefore include as much as one can fluent write about.

As I dove into geo-politics and race, I began with standard libertarian and conservative works back as far as 12 years ago, but in the last three years branched out into much more technical and numerous classical works on statecraft and civilization studies.   Aldous Huxley was instructive, insofar as The Perennial Philosophy makes lucid the kind of globalist philosophy he envisions.  Also relevant was Hegel’s work on the state, which point to a monolithic positive theory of absolutism wherein the individual is an atom of the whole to such a degree that personhood is not accorded to those outside the state.  Philosopher Charles Taylor has some good assessments of Hegel’s political theory, which can be seen as the precursor to modern absolutist fascism, as well as Marx’s statist stage of communism.  Marx was, of course, a Young Hegelian.  Collectivism seems ingrained in the mass man.  Indeed, Mussolini wrote defining “fascism” in regard to this “positive” action on the part of the state (as opposed to the Enlightenment liberal idea of the state’s existence being “negative,” merely restraining forces):

” The foundation of Fascism is the conception of the State, its character, its duty, and its aim. Fascism conceives of the State as an absolute, in comparison with which all individuals or groups are relative, only to be conceived of in their relation to the State. The conception of the Liberal State is not that of a directing force, guiding the play and development, both material and spiritual, of a collective body, but merely a force limited to the function of recording results: on the other hand, the Fascist State is itself conscious and has itself a will and a personality — thus it may be called the “ethic” State….

…The Fascist State organizes the nation, but leaves a sufficient margin of liberty to the individual; the latter is deprived of all useless and possibly harmful freedom, but retains what is essential; the deciding power in this question cannot be the individual, but the State alone….” (source)

Dwight’s Mussolini speech.

Fascism is marked by the merger of the private sector and the state, as well as a fanatical nationalism or imperialism.  Our modern era is turning back to this from democracy as Spengler prophesied, yet in the form of a Third Way, and not an overt caesarism.  Alasdair MacIntyre’s work on communitarianism is also interesting, given that his philosophy of virtue has many good points, but collectivism is fraught with difficulties, not the least of which is the dismal track of central planned economies, such as the Soviet Union.  MacIntyre, in my opinion, is a much better philosopher, particularly in his work Whose Justice, Which Rationality? and on linguistic narratives.  This is relevant, insofar as modern trendy libertarians often pop up and lecture me on basics I came to ten years ago, and moved out of–particularly the fact that so-called libertarianism, or classical liberalism, is an Enlightenment philosophy that is itself wrought with problems and difficulties.  The purpose of this article, however, is not to devolve into Robert Nozick or Ron Paul.  The point here is that delving into racial studies and geo-political/civilization studies has emerged for me as a crucial  arena which is hidden from most people.  Francis Parker Yockey was invaluable in this regard, though I needn’t mention that I obviously disagree with much of the book, particularly his national socialism and fascism.  What is relevant is that the book is one of the best introductions to geo-politics one could envision.  Prophetic as well, it describes the track of the twentieth century, based on his perspicacity as a cultured imperialist.  In a way, it is like a technical Aeneid, which was a Roman lyrical version of geo-political lessons. 

The reason I continue to tout the work after disagreeing with much of it was its ability to make clear that statecraft and geo-politics do not operate on ideals and petty moralisms.   The masses, however, especially in the modern world, suppose that democracy is a real thing and that their “vote” matters, despite voter fraud, electronic voting machines and mass stupidity.  And it should be noted that this was also an Enlightenment ideal–that of voting for, and electing leaders.  Yockey’s Imperium accurately notes that the Enlightenment was dead in his day, but that for the populace to catch up, it would take decades.  His foresight here was correct, inasmuch as the continued existence of the American republican system is, in the mind of common Americans, a real entity.  The reality is quite the opposite: the American ideal of government by the people has never existed, aside from possibly the early colonies.  Certainly no superstate run by international corporations and banks that are larger than many nations’ GDPs can honestly still be viewed as an Enlightenment progeny. 

Zbigniew Brzezinski's "The Grand Chessboard" is a great starting place for modern geo-politics.

The reality is, the Enlightenment was both a success for progress in some regards, and a failure in others.  For one, it failed to understand the human nature cannot be universalized cross-racially.  The era was somewhat inconsistent in this regard, since slaveholders existed simultaneously with so-called liberals that touted the indefectibility of human reason.  No doubt reason is an invaluable tool, but it is not had universally.  The British adopted eugenics and population control, as well as Darwinism within this strand of thought with Malthus, Galton, Huxley, and others, which then gave way to Fabian socialism and Bertrand Russell which is the height of what Rene Guenon calls the “reign of quantity.”  Mankind is conceived of as a collective entity subject to numerical ratiocination and pure scientism.  But it is a scientism that is merely a return to gnosticism and classical barbarism in many respects.  Sociology, with August Comte and the Comte de St. Simon would take French Revolutionary and Illuminist thought into the collectivist realm, and combine it with the “reign of quantity” to produce a rationalized (in the Weberian sense), abstract absolutist state which, through panoptic surveillance, can constantly spy on the Orwellian animal farm.  Numericalized and bestialized mankind has now replaced the divine, Promethean idea that the Enlightenment originally birthed. 

Yockey, following Spengler’s lead, was correct in his analyses of these areas, as well as the faulty reductionism in Freudianism, Marxism and Darwinism.  All three attempt to collectivize man into a single conceptual notion for the purpose of efficient production.  There is sexual man, homo economicus and animal man.  All other forms and relations are excluded, and this relates back to the point of educational reductionism and discreet fragmentation mentioned above, where no one discipline has any relation to any other.  In an age of homo economicus, it is evident that economics is what dominates man due to number being demythologized from a sephirotic emanation to a nominalistic linguistic token.  The modern era is one of the dominance of techne, as Ratzinger correctly explains in Introduction to Christianity, where man’s ideals and modus operandi are all geared towards the ever-increasing efficiency of technological processes; a kind of mechanical Kali-yuga. 

From Locke's blank slate is birthed the propositional American nation.

Thus America comes into being as a nation supposedly conceived rationally, as if nations can be created propositionally. In this regard, the naive, Enlightenment rationalism evident in the founders’ minds was somewhat of a mixed notion in that the platitudes about man’s inmate rights and dignity was proposed with no real philosophical basis other than Protestantism and natural laws, which are faulty pillars if ever there were any.  It is like the Calvinist dogma of the invisible church, where the “true” church of the elect is propositional, and not the same as the “visible” church that actually is, within history.   In short the error in all these positions, be it Enlightenment rationalism, Laissez-faire free market capitalism, classical liberalism, American exceptionalism and expansionism, democracy, liberalism, communism, socialism, statism, and all the assorted “isms” of the past three hundred years, is their idealization.  I don’t mean ideal in the sense that no one can have ideal beliefs, but the notion of constructing a rational system that can then be pasted onto reality, as if the world itself was a tabula rasa.  Indeed, it is itself the Enlightenment which conceived of man as a tabula rasa to be environmentally steered in whatever direction the state or social engineer desired.  Christianity itself treats man and the world in this same way, as if it were a blank slate that a rationally adopted system can magically be made to conform to. 

But the discovery of DNA in 20th century laid all that to rest, as well as all positions based on egalitarianism.  Unfortunately, the libertarians for the most part haven’t figured this out, and still operate on the notion that men are all the same.  Men are not all the same, and certainly race effects economics, since economic performance will obviously correlate to IQ, social standing, talents, abilities, etc., which are directly connected to DNA and genetics.  Where the free market was right was in realizing the incredible potential that could be released in societies where individual freedoms and rights are guarded by the rule of law.  It is important to not bifurcate on America as something either good or bad.   Nothing in life is so easily classified and it is itself an immature and phony idealism that still thinks in these  categories in geo-politics, where moralisms do not exist.   It is only partly due to the good aspects of the Enlightenment that America rose to such power and prominence, as well as racial issues.   Sub-saharan Africa could never have produced the wealth and creativity that America did in two hundred years, simply by implementing some governmental form.  This is the chief error of the Americanists and libertarians, who act as if they literally don’t know anything about race and history (though they often talk to no end like they are the intellectual masters of both).  

Having been reduced, then, to homo-economicus in the modern world, it is therefore necessary to understand global capitalism and its socialist dialectical opposite.  Another fact that libertarians and “constitutionalists” fail to understand is the globalizing nature of capitalism itself.  In fact, The Road to Serfdom contains an entire essay by Hayek on internationalism and global authority, despite the fact that the libertarians and free market capitalists never talk about it.  Global capitalism is precisely what went forth as an iconoclastic force for destruction, in terms of localized economies and traditions.  If anyone doubts this, all one has to do is look at deregulation and free trade, as well as something like John Perkins’ Confessions of an Economic Hitman.  Joseph Stiglitz has also written about this, as well as even Marx himself.  

Note that I am not attacking capitalism or saying it is “bad” or entirely “good.”  Again, in terms of geo-poltics, the conern is what is, not what should be.  Every man may, and will, have is ideals and may work for those ideals as he lists, but what matters in the end is what is.  I might believe Byzantium was the greatest form of government, and strive to create New Byzantium or move to Russia and seek to revive the Third Empire, but the student of history who has read his Spengler knows that empires have an organic lifespan and are never resurrected.   History, like it or not, does not work that way.  Now, certainly there are movers and shakers in history who do have ideals and do work tirelessly to see them enacted, and do achieve legitimate change.  However, is it still erroneous to assume that this means an entirely rational system can be cut and pasted onto the world.  In terms of geo-political analysis, again what matters is what is.  Capitalism is a fascinating phenomenon and much of what Ayn Rand writes in her book Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal is correct.  The rise of the individual is the story of western man, from ancient Greece and Judaism, to the Magna Carta, to the U.S. Constitution.  The presupposition here is the rule of law and the right of the individual, allowing him the freedom to flourish.  This form of elitism is correct, and admittedly more just, though there are positive things to be said for monarchy, as per Otto von Habsburg. 

In short, I am sick of the narrowness with which the modern debate has been framed.  The average intellectual hops online, and has an entire milieu of completely irrelevant positions to choose from, most of which have been completely made irrelevant by the Internet alone.  Anyone seeking to rebuild Byzantium through blogs hasn’t a clue about how the world really works, and is stuck in the propositional rationalizing I mentioned above.  What does matter in the world is religion, economics, technology and geo-politics.   The perspective here taken is one of the objective analyst, not the passionate apologist.   I still have passionate views on matters, but I am also mature enough to realize that I can separately and objectively (as objectively as possible) analyze the current state of affairs.  For example, if an analyst fails to take into account race and DNA, and academic studies like this, one of the most important discoveries of the previous centuries, one may rest assured they are marginally relevant as a commentator, and likely still operating on dated Enlightenment presuppositions.  

Even though racial distinctions are real and associated with IQ distribution as the chart above makes clear, they aren't because DNA doesn't exist, even though it does.

This is not to say my interest aren’t still theological and religious. They are, but insofar as I aspire to analyze, I expand into other fields.   I have learned that it is small-minded and petty persons who will discourage you from mastering other fields, and often it is out of their own jealousy that they do so.  Particularly amongst religious and academic persons have I heard the endless mantra and complaint about my own excessive love for debate and mastering the opposing position, whatever that may have been.  But these small-minded persons simply could not grasp Aristotle’s dictum that an “intelligent man can understand a position without adopting it,” to paraphrase.  That is what analysis is about, and it is supposed to be what education is about, despite the fact that many of the worst persons I have dealt with were dishonest intellectuals and quackademics.  So expect the ante to be upped, from my side, and the topics here to get more hardcore and serious.  If that’s offensive to you, then go back to your new Byzantium feminist blog and don’t let the mouse hit you on the way out.


Jay’s Analysis Intro to Philosophy – Relativism – Flight From Reality

0
0

Truth? Objectivity? Logic? Knowledge? Metaphysics? Who cares? I do! You can’t have a proper education without philosophy! In this discussion, I give an impromptu introduction to philosophy – a 101 class, if you will. I cover the three major branches of philosophy: ethics, knowledge, and metaphysics, and how these three are inter-related and make up a worldview. I give examples, cite relevant philosophical works, and decostruct relativism as a prime example “doing philosophy” and why it matters.


The Cold War is Not Over – International Socialism’s Attack

0
0

U.S.S.A.

“We believe that all men are created equal.” -J.F.K.

By: Jay

My recent research has involved international socialism and the Cold War attack on the West.  In many “conspiracy” circles, often tending towards leftism, it’s very popular to paint the picture that the Cold War was a giant facade intent upon bolstering the buildup of the giant surveillance state.  There is some truth to this: For example, Professor Antony Sutton did produce evidence of support from certain powerful Western elites for the Soviet Union and its rise, particularly with regard to Soviet industrialization, while David Rockefeller aided in the installation of Mao Zedong, writing in the New York Times that the Chinese model was to be the model for social transformation of the East and West.

Indeed, other writers have mentioned the convergence of East and West into a mixed economy of a world socialist state of a third or fourth way.  In this regard, fascist powers were not really in conflict with centralized state communist powers, and received Western elite support as well, as pawns in the global chessboard and as social engineering experiments.  Fabian socialism, international socialism/Marxism, international corporatism,  Imperialism, and shadow government/cryptocracy are all models that are global in extent.  While it might seem wisdom to speak of limitations of expansion and imperial hubris, the reality is, the world state is always in flux, with competing, multi-polar powers seeking to topple rivals.  That “peace” will be achieved by some legislation or utopian visions are, of course, products of human naivety and never realistic.

Our era is one of multi-polar powers, but those multi-polar powers are largely controlled by a shadow government/cryptocracy that is presently the Anglo-establishment.   While this structure has received much bad press over the century, the subtle complexity of our actual geo-political is not easily discernible.  Binary models of East versus West or capitalism versus socialism are oversimplifications, but in reality these forces are real and are in opposition.  To those of the school of convergence, the East and West will be merged into a world socialist republic ruled by a technocractic and financial elite.   This form elitism assumes itself to be based on Darwinianism mechanistic process and Pelagian, Enlightenment tabula rasa social engineering, intent on establishing a “rational” global order or global environmental  eugenic legislation.  This is the dominant ideology of the present Western liberal elite.  Mechanistic, materialistic Darwinism thus melds well with collectivist models like Marxism, as well as so-called individualistic anarcho-capitalism, known as social Darwinism.

Liberty! Equality! Bullshit!

One need only look to someone like H.G. Wells, who wrote in many places, including his Outlines of History, that a masonic socialist order would eventually arise from utopian socialism.  This leads to the thrust of this article: Grand Orient Freemasonry, the power behind international socialism and communism, is not dead, and continues to seek the destruction of the West.  Grand Orient Freemasonry, it must be carefully noted, is atheistic and Satanic.  In contrast to the more conservative British Masonic Orders that remain loyal to the monarchy, Grand Orient Freemasonry can be seen as tied into the P-2 lodge, with its scandals, as well as the infiltration of the Vatican through its power source, Moscow.  Moscow, aside from being aided by powerful western elites, did become a superpower and was a threat.  Whatever one’s view of the Vatican, the infiltration of Rome by all forms of subversion was very real, and was largely handled out of Moscow and aided by the Gramscian Italian communists.  In fact, the Grand Orient/P-2 were intimately involved in the assassination of John Paul I, as we know from the Roberto Calvi scandal.

The infiltration of the West also included the infiltration of Britain’s MI6 and the United States’ CIA, and the famous examples of this are the 1995 Venona Incercepts of the NSA, which backed up Sen. Joseph McCarthy (as did the KGB archives), as well as the famous Philby case of infiltration into MI6 by several KGB spies.  The events described in fiction in Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy by John LeCarre are summed up in reality in Peter Wright’s well-known Spy Catcher.  Further, under FDR, the KGB intercepts included 221 KGB spies in the U.S. government.  This is quote obvious when one looks at the history of FDR, who clealry favored Sovietism and Stalinism.  Yalta delivered 750 million people into Sovietism and the FDR policies led to an intensification of America (and the world’s) path to socialism.  In fact, FDR openly supported the basic planks of the socialist party of his day, very similar to the planks of the Communist Manifesto, as well as mandating gold be collected and exchanged for federal reserve notes (precisely what Mao did).   In fact, FDR’s longtime righthand man and VP, Henry Wallace, was an open and avowed communist and Satanist.

It is thus this same strand of contintental Masonry that produced the collectivist nightmares of Weishaupt’s Illuminati, the Paris Commune, the Jacobins, the Napoleonic revolution, as well as the rest of the socialist revolutions of the 19th century which saw the overthrow of the monarchies.  In their place, “democratic republics of the people” were erected on secular, atheistic bases with the intent of the utopian establishment of liberte, egalite, and fraternite, premised on the “brotherhood’s” “rights of man.”  It must again be stressed that this was the continental, French Grand Orient tradition of radical masonry intent on wiping away all remnants of the ancien regime, and by human social contract, building a new world order.  Marat, Danton, Robespierre, Condorcet, Voltaire, Rousseau, and the rest of the rabble assumed they were enthroning “Reason” and “Liberty” as new rationalistic symbols of atheistic deities, and thus the American “Statue of Liberty.”  This strand of Masonry is outlined in John Daniel’s Scarlet and the Beast and Msgr. George Dillon’s Grand Orient Masonry Unmasked.

East German Flag with Grand Orient Masonic “Workers” Symbolism

The entire assumption of this strand is that men are entirely equal – total egalitarianism/equalitarianism.  As the course of secret and suppressed groups in Europe shows, gnosticism interacted with these groups to produce its opposite in an earthly messianism of materialistic social salvation through dialectical and scientific processes.  Since life is purely quantifiable, life could be explained and totalized in a grand narrative of “scientific process,” resulting in the eventual Enlightened utopia.  What this has actually produced is the tyranny of the collectivist central committee, regardless of whatever name it received, whether Maoist, Hitlerian, or Paris Commune.  And the reason it produces these tyrannies is because they are all based on a faulty anthropology.  Denying metaphysics, these systems have exalted the collective herdmind to divine status, producing disaster after disaster.  If man is nothing but a collection of chemicals, then all ills can be solved through the reorganization of those chemicals and molecules.

However, the re-education camp collectivism of the statist internationalists is not a formation of the “new man” of Che Guevara’s propaganda, but a destruction of all things good.  In other words, the world is precisely the opposite of what the socialists imagine.  Men are not equal.  Men and women are not the same (note that continental Grand Orient Masonry allowed women).  Nations are not the same.  All things are not equal, and enforced equality is enforced tyranny.  And, ironically, the very nation that has survived with its monarchy is also the one that made the discovery of the DNA helix which is the downfall of all the socialists, egalitarians, Marxists and liberals.   In the Soviet Union, there was a party line on what was “true” in regard to race, DNA and genetics dictated by the quack “science” of Lysenko.  Honest, educated individuals should rejoice in the discovery of DNA and genetics, as they are the complete and utter annihilation of the destructive tabula rasa nonsense of the Enlightenment egalitarians.

FDR’s Communist Vice President Henry Wallace

Returning to the subject of the Cold War, the fall of the wall and communism, I believe, as Anatoly Golitsin and Christopher Story exposed, was a calculated deception on the part of the internationale to coax the West into laxity and inaction, thus assuring the triumph of the socialists.  This is proven by Golitsin’s books New Lies for Old and The Perestroika Deception have been prophetic in regard to the Ostpolitik.  In this regard, it is crucial to connect this to Malachi Martin’s The Keys of This Blood, which intimately tracks the progress of the internationalists and Satanists in infiltrating the Vatican for the purpose of using it as a mouthpiece for world socialism, as the Alta Vendita documents also demonstrate.  This is also demonstrated by the radical turns taken at Vatican II, as well as the famed interview with Alice von Hildebrand, where she stated:

“Clerical abuse against children, charges of Mafia-style cover-ups, and the destruction of Catholic moral teaching are tearing at the Catholic Church, and turning the 2,000 year-old faith into fodder for lowbrow comedy.

An affidavit recently obtained by INA Today attributes the Catholic Church’s present state of collapse to a calculated attack beginning decades ago, with initial successes appearing in the 1960s.

The affidavit affirms that Communist Party organizer and high Party official, Bella Dodd, made public statements during the decade of the 1960s declaring that the Catholic priesthood was infiltrated by numerous Communist agents, whose mission was “to destroy the Catholic Church from within.”

Dodd later returned to the Catholic Church and published a book about her experiences, entitled School of Darkness (out of print at present).

“In the late 1920’s and 1930’s, directives were sent from Moscow to all Communist Party organizations. In order to destroy the Catholic Church from within, party members were to be planted in seminaries and within diocesan organizations,” Dodd stated according to the affidavit.

“I, myself, put some 1,200 men in Catholic seminaries,” Dodd publicly declared.”

The encyclical Pacem en Terris of John XXIII and Populorum Progressio of Paul VI are thus also clear evidences of this infiltration, resulting in radical calls before unheard of, notably for the socialist United Nations, international economic central planning, and global wealth redistribution – all of which are longtime goals of the Grand Orient socialists and communists, using the Vatican as their mouthpiece as they had long-planned.   In short, communuism is the enemy still, and the leftists, Marxists, liberals and internationalists did not magically disappear because some wall fell down.  Indeed, many of them, such as Gorbachev himself are founding members of the phony “green movement,” touted as the first “global revolution.”

Another proof of this is the radical change in the United States’ landscape which only fits with the totality plan of the international socialists.   A proof often overlooked is the pyschological warfare and social engineering subversion of the culture as a whole.  When people attack “capitalism” and America as the evil “western aggressor,” they are generally speaking of a certain mindset among collectivist liberal elites, that “democracy” can be established worldwide, which is nothing more than a cloak for corporate socialist imperialism.  America and the West have thus been subverted by communism of the Grand Orient variety.  This alone is able to explain the almost total implementation of the Communist planks, as well as the social degradation of communist subversion in the social arena.  The hatred people are developing are not for the older version of America, but the new socialist hell hole they have opted for.

The wrecking ball.

Mass delusion is what the masses deserve, generally speaking, since, when it becomes evident to the communist elites that the masses are a herd and not the revolutionary vanguard they imagine, the communist elites turn on them and kill in the millions.    This anger with the inability of the proletariat to become the rational egalitarian scientist genii they’re imagined to be in Marxist nonsense becomes a source of intense hatred, resulting in their punishment, as right-wing commentator Jonathan Bowden has observed.   This is evident in Leninism and the inevitable outcome of the elitist, authoritarian turn of Horkheimer and Adorno in Dialectic of the Enlightenment of the Frankfurt School.   This is the dangerous psychopathy the left and the Marxist revolutionaries experience when they realize their entire worldview is bullshit, resulting in the punishment and torture of the stubborn masses.

No, the Cold War has most certainly not ended: It is in full swing.  As time passes, more documents and intercepts emerge which further demonstrate the continued battle to bring revolutionary destruction to establish the enforced egalitarian hell hole these losers and roustabouts imagine can be erected by “education.”  For example, Polish priests have been exposed as “former” KGB spies.   All the attacks on the Western norms of national defense, hierarchy, capitalism and tradition are still supported from the international socialist centers, who have poisoned the entire globe with self-destructive and genocidal “humanitarianism.”  Even if there were no evidence of international socialist subversion, and it were able to be totally underground, the fact that almost all the socialist goals have been achieved demonstrates the fact of the continued Cold War.  Simply watch the famous instructional video from former KGB psychological warfare chief Yuri Bezmenov, detailing the usage of subversion by support for anything fringe and alternative.


Soviet Cold War Subversion, Illuminism and Psy Ops

0
0
Modern EU poster: Soviet star with Soviet symbol.

Modern EU poster: Soviet star with Soviet symbol.

By: Jay

“I will force the enemy to take our strength for weakness, and our weakness for strength, and thus will turn his strength into weakness.” Sun Tzu

Ours is an era of integration, unification and conglomeration.  Arising from that trend came the Cold War: a fascinating phenomenon of two superpowers that supposedly waged a planetary battle of western “freedom” versus eastern “communism” for control of the world.  The reality is that this battle was both engineered and real.  Insofar as Mao was concerned, we know David Rockefeller praised Mao’s “revolution” in his famous 1979 editorial.  Upon visiting China, Rockefeller mentions Deng Xiaoping’s “capitalist” reforms, which led to the modern third way experience in China today.  Rockefeller also mentions this at length in his autobiography, Memoirs.

In this way, a top western elite provides a great example of how, at times, the Cold War was furthered and aided by western finance.  One can see this as well in examples of western aid to build up Soviet power under Roosevelt, an obvious communist.  Under FDR, countless Soviet and communist agents of change and outright spies were allowed to enter the U.S.  Truman and McCarthy attempted to reverse this trend by taking action to discover the Soviet spies allegedly existing at all levels of western power. Recent release of Soviet archives shows these allegations to be correct: there were hundreds of Soviet spies at all levels of government, as the Philby affair shows for the United Kingdom.

This trend continued into the 1980s, with the Cold War purportedly reviving under Reagan and the attempt to stop the “evil empire” and Gorbachev from destroying the last bastion of freedom.  Kruschev had previously threatened at the United Nations that he would infiltrate and destroy the West from within, and the Cold War continued supposedly until the fall of the wall. Pope John Paul II also took credit with Reagan in this facade of ending the battle, with perestroika, an openness to the West, as the sign of victory.  During this time, important Central Intelligence and MI6 analysts were saying otherwise.

Based on the revelations of defectors like Masterspy Oleg Penkovsky, Anatoliy Golitsyn, and Soviet psychological warfare expert, Yuri Bezmenov, western intelligence agents like Maurice Oldfield and James Jesus Angleton thought otherwise:  it looked as if the long-term Soviet strategy was precisely one of a feigned defenselessness.  What if communist subversion meant the incremental, gradual plan of decades-long infiltration, subversion, and psychological warfare, that was meant to take down the West through covert means, as opposed to nuclear means?  What if the Soviet plan had not ended with the fall of some wall in Germany?

Soviet film poster with pyramid and all seeing eye.

Soviet film poster with pyramid and all seeing eye.

There is plenty of evidence to back up this conclusion.  This does not mean, however, that certain Western elites never aided communism, nor that the Cold War was all a facade. While at the top of the pyramid the elites are international (as can be seen from Rockefeller’s Memoirs), the government classes of both East and West waged a real war.  The reality is the communists/Soviets won World War II, and from thenceforth have won the culture war.  Western elites have retained their capitalist beliefs in theory, yet the present globo-capital corporatocracy is much closer to a fascist/socialist internationalism of the left than any older model of the free market.

The global upper class thus function with an international capitalist praxis, while the lower classes are being socially engineered into a multicultural blob of nanny state socialism.  To make a long story short, it is as if we are seeing a convergence of these two “ways” into a global “third way,” yet even this is inaccurate, as the fact of the matter is, these systems are targeted for different classes.  For the middle and lower classes, the target is socialism, communism and urbanism, engineered by the United Nations for certain corporate interests. This is why we observe the same trends in all nations towards IMF involvement, centralized economic planning through megabank machinations, and a fiat-based currency, with exorbitant high taxes and virulent socialism.  It is as if the Fabian socialists, the communists, the fascists and American capitalists were all social experiments to determine the utility of different systems in action: the best way to do an experiment.  Yet in these system’s outworkings, we see real warfare, and that is crucial.

One constantly hears in American alternative media the claims of the Anglo-American establishment’s usage of false flag terrorism, for example.  One almost never hears in western media, however, Russian and Chinese use of terror tactics and authoritarianism.  We hear all day about Al Qaeda and Islamic terror, but we do not hear about Russian and Chinese terror and espionage, aside from a few news articles here and there that reveal astounding tactics on the part of both nations.  Both China and Russia are constantly caught using spy rings to infiltrate and surveil the West, yet in turn, the western elite seem to welcome and allow this subversion.  From the think tank machinations of the Rand Corporation to the Brookings Institute and the CFR, the western approach appears to be one of welcomed attack on the west itself. The Anglo elite seem to have adopted the policies of the supposed enemy to such a degree that it almost necessitates some deeper, hidden purpose.

Masterspy James Jesus Angleton

Masterspy James Jesus Angleton

For all intents and purposes, we can accurately say that the socialists/communists have won and are still winning.  Almost the entire west has adopted the point by point model of communist infiltration and subversion.  So even if there are certain western elites who funded communism, the accusation of many analysts that the danger of sovietism/communism is no longer a threat is downright false, bordering on astounding falsehood.  Regardless of whether big capital has funded communism at times, the present force of destruction is unmistakenly red.  In 1963 the HUAC produced a point by point plan of communistic subversion of the west that, 50 years later, is no longer a theory.  When one grasps the immensity and success of this formula, combined with the indepth correlations and intrigues still going on, it is impossible to deny.

To what end?  Certainly not all the Anglo elites are secret communists, but the release of the red threat from any restraint has facilitated an almost complete cultural success of red subversion.  As we learn from Soviet psych warfare manuals and experts, the funding and promotion of all things “alternative” is key.  From the perspective of warfare, the enemy must be demoralized and defeated mentally, as the classic Art of War of Sun-Tzu explains.  Thus most of the energy in espionage will be spent in mass media psy ops and propaganda with the intention of capturing the mind of the enemy populace.  The enemy’s forces are only as powerful as they are united, so the art of dividing the enemy is the first and foremost goal.  During the 1950s and 60s this was done through racial uprisings and student uprisings, both supported by the communists in America.

Delacroix's "Liberty" - the "liberty" of Jacobin terror

Delacroix’s “Liberty” – the “liberty” of Jacobin terror

To understand the end of communism and red terror, it is important to understand its origin: Bavarian Illuminism.  The so-called “Illuminati” were a rationalist sect of socialists seeking liberty, equality and fraternity, as outlined in the French Revolution.  This was a revolution that followed upon the “scientific revlution,” with gnosis, or knowledge as the key to man’s salvation and apotheosis.  Rather than a cadre of devil worshippers, the Illuminists sought freedom from dogma and superstition, yet the manifestations of the Jacobins in France were anything but tolerant utopian bliss.  Instead, there was mass terror, and in the analysis of terrorism, it is crucial to understand the french terror: the font from which all modern state terror arises. From the Jacobins other sects learned terrorism, with the spread of ideological socialism/communism falling to the Frankfurt School in Germany, Antionio Gramsci in Italy, and the various Bolshevik and Soviet bloc figures.  It is here that we see the expansion of weaponized culture.  In fact, the previously mentioned Soviet 45 point psy op plan investigated by HUAC in 1963 noted this, as we see a total cultural overthrow through subversion:

“15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.

16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.

17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers’ associations. Put the party line in textbooks.

18. Gain control of all student newspapers.

19. Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations which are under Communist attack.

20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policymaking positions.

21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.

22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to “eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms.”

23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. “Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art.”

24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them “censorship” and a violation of free speech and free press.

25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.

26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.”

27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with “social” religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity which does not need a “religious crutch.”

28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of “separation of church and state.”

29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis. (Source)

It is thus self-evident that this is the game plan the system has adopted to destroy the West.  And the West has happily obliged, as cultural Marxism is now the acceptable norm, even if not the economic norm (yet).  The demoralization and destruction of the morale and unity of the populace and the capturing of the mind is precisely the goal of psychological warfare, as I mentioned above.  Joel Skousen is correct in his analysis of the hidden nature of the communism in our age.  It is not dead, it is alive in well in culture, and still covertly operating among the bureaucratic class.

This is where Anatoliy Golitsyn comes in as a crucial figure able to predict the fall of the Berlin Wall.  We read about Golitsyn:

In 1984, Golitsyn published the book New Lies For Old, wherein he predicted the collapse of the communist bloc orchestrated from above. He warned about a long-term deception strategy designed to lull the West into a false sense of security, and finally economically cripple and diplomatically isolate the United States. Among other things, Golitsyn stated:
・ “The ‘liberalization’ [in the Soviet Union] would be spectacular and impressive. Formal pronouncements might be made about a reduction in the communist party’s role; its monopoly would be apparently curtailed.”
・ “If [liberalization] should be extended to East Germany, demolition of the Berlin Wall might even be contemplated.”
・ “The Eurpoean Union might become an all-European socialist parliament with representation from the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe. ‘Europe from the Atlantic to the Urals’ would turn out to be a neutral, socialist Europe.”
Angleton and Golitsyn reportedly sought the assistance of William F. Buckley (who once worked for the CIA) in writing New Lies for Old. Buckley refused but later went on to write a novel about Angleton, Spytime: The Undoing of James Jesus Angleton.” (Source)

anatoliy-golitsyn

Defector Anatoliy Golitsyn

Oddly, in Stephen Dorril’s lengthy analysis of MI6, there are odd statements regarding this prediction, as well as Angleton and Maurice Oldfield’s actions.  In fact, it was not until 1961 that the West had its first detailed chain of command chart for the Soviet hierarchy, Dorril notes, from the ARNIKA document leak of Oleg Penkovsky.  Yet while Dorril admits the importance of the leaks from Penkovsky and Golitsin, Dorril disdains the “conspiratorial” claims of Golitsyn and Penkovsky, they were able to convince masterspy James Jesus Angleton of their validity, as well as several top MI6 analysts like Maurice Oldfield.  Also up for debate was the question of the Sino-Soviet split as real or also a deception.  (See Dorril, MI6: Inside the Covert World of Her Majesty’s Seceret Intelligence Service, 703-715).

Have we not seen the very things Golitsyn predicted?  Have we not seen the integration and socialization of Europe as well as the fall of Berlin Wall?  Have we not seen the Marxist and red terror explosion in the last few decades?  Have we not seen the total victory of cultural Marxism?  Without a doubt, even if Golitsyn was wrong, he was right.


On Evil, Intrigue and the Left

0
0
Dr. Evil

Dr. Evil

By: Jay

It is often the case that detractors, opponents and skeptics will themselves latch onto a catchphrase or cliché statement about “how the world really works” in order to debunk the claims of anyone who challenges the mainstream account of events.  For them, “conspiracy theorists” will read everything as a conspiracy.  Ironically, the forebears of modern leftists were themselves the ones who asked questions about the status quo of their day, but as one learns in the study of paradigms and worldviews, the new opinions become the new dogmas.  As Foucault correctly explained, the modern world did not rid itself of hierarchy, “shepherds” and authority: it merely exchanged the old ones for a new.

Not all truths are to be told to all men, and not all people are sufficiently mature to deal with the harsh realities of realpolitik.  The fact remains that men are easily duped and fooled.  The system knows this, and thus statecraft is based largely on psychology and social engineering.  Guided by pragmatism, this idea is ancient, but Machiavelli is a great example.  For Machiavelli, statecraft was precisely the ability to manage intrigue.  And the reality is, it is much more this than ideology that guides men and nations.  In his Art of War, Machiavelli writes of the corruption of the military industrial complex of his day:

“But because military institutions have become completely corrupt and far removed from the ancient ways, these sinister opinions have arisen which make the military hated and intercourse with those who train them avoided. And I, judging, by what I have seen and read, that it is not impossible to restore its ancient ways and return some form of past virtue to it, have decided not to let this leisure time of mine pass without doing something, to write what I know of the art of war, to the satisfaction of those who are lovers of the ancient deeds. And although it requires courage to treat of those matters of which others have made a profession, none the less, I do not believe that it is a mistake to occupy a position with words, which may, with greater presumption, have been occupied with deeds; for the errors which I should make in writing can be corrected without injury to anyone, but those which are made with deeds cannot be found out except by the ruin of the Commanders.”

Even Machiavelli longed for an earlier age of purportedly more virtuous warfare.  Perhaps this was his Atlantean/Platonic fantasy.  In our day, the military industrial complex is corrupt, but for the left to say that the “military industrial complex” is the source of American evil misses the point, as well as most leftist views of evil.  For the modern herd-minded hipster horde of “leftists,” the only “conspiracy” is that of the few fringe “extremists” who haven’t joined Obama and the modern, enlightened world of “social democracy.”  For the modern authoritarian left, the source of “evil” (if there is such a thing) is found in institutions and structure (except for the modern global government being erected!).  For them, wealth, success, growth, knowledge, life and existence are themselves evil.  Evil is located within the very being of created reality, and for the “leftists” who turn to Buddhism and Eastern philosophy (as the trendies do), evil is located in particularity.  Particulars is being used here in the philosophical sense: individuality, particularity, and singular objects, distinguished from others.  This is a classic notion of Eastern philosophies, which tends to focus on holism.

The World is Not Enough.

The World is Not Enough.

But is this the case?  Is it true that particular things are “bad”?  Is “evil” a result of distinguishing things, as well as gradations in things?   The solution given in this worldview is a move towards a radical holism – monism.  Monism is the philosophical view that all reality is one thing.  Historically, there have been monists who saw all reality as an idea (solipsists), others who saw reality as a manifestation of the One (Platonism), or even materialists and atomists, seeing all reality as purely “atoms.”  For these worldviews, distinction and difference are in some form an illusion or an ontologically dubious category that must in some way be overcome.

The all-encompassing One is beyond all distinction and classification and not capable of any real relation to any thing.  Given that presupposition, the manifestation of this world and its beauties and tragedies are to be transcended through some negation of their real existence or meditation, etc.  One can now see why this consciously anti-rational view would be entertained by the modern left.  While the desire to see reality holistically and all things related in a grand narrative found here is right – that is the direction in which we should go – this view and the modern left desires to encompass all reality in the impersonal One in a different grand narrative and design.  This grand narrative or great plan uses the idiot horde leftists as tools – a manipulated horde shifted and manipulated by other degenerates for one grand goal: wreck it all, that all may be “equal.”

Radical egalitarianism is one of the most fanatical, dangerous and inconsistent positions of the modern authoritarian left.  Since evil is located by the authoritarian left in distinctions and differences, all these must be obliterated.  That includes race and gender, which must be said to be “social constructs.”  It seems odd that anyone would believe anything so absurd, but this extremist view of social engineering is held so tenaciously because of deeper, more foundational philosophical commitments.  To be even clearer, the philosophical commitment is not held because of some mere error in thinking.  On the contrary, the notion that all humans need to be cured of evil desires is good education is precisely the root of the problem.  For the modern authoritarian left, man’s problem in the collectivist equation is his lack of education.  This is why, for the left, their “elite” are the supposed academic, political and theater classes, all of which are socially oriented classes.  This is the fundamental flaw that must be unmasked in modern authoritarian liberalism, and is must be exposed by the use of reason and logic, but reason and logic are viewed by them as prisons and strictures to be rejected.

Sawyer plays the confidence man in the Lost episode of the same title.

Sawyer plays the confidence man in the Lost episode of the same title.

In this regard, evil is simultaneously rational and irrational.  Because evil is irrational, in its rebellion against the order that reason imposes, it seeks to be irrational and chaotic to fight reason.  But implicit in this drive to be irrational is a kind of logic – a logoi of evil, which is therefore still rational.  Van Til called this becoming epistemically self-conscious – evil seeks to become consistent with itself, in its inconsistency.  Evil cannot be consistent with its attack on reason – to do so is a manifestation of still being rational.  In this analysis, I don’t mean to suggest any kind of rationalism of the Enlightenment version.  I mentioned Foucault above and many in the postmodern and existentialist schools will see in this paragraph “rationalism.”  I once had a long discussion with one of my postmodern professors who accused this kind of analysis of being rationalism.  In response to that it should be made clear that talk of reason as a tool and a divine light given to man is not the same thing as the Enlightenment/Jacobin enthronement of “reason” as a kind of pseudo-goddess.  The professor is right that Enlightenment rationalism is an excess, but so is the far eastern rejection of logic and reason en toto!

It is always the temptation of humans to make evil have an actual ontological existence.  By this it is not meant that there is no evil, that it is some illusion.  On the contrary, evil is very real, but in the technical philosophical sense it has no actual ontological existence.  It has no “being,” if you will.  Evil is a relative term – it is the move of a will away from some good.  It is not a “thing” or a substance.  In fact, evil is not even the will, which is a faculty given by God.  Evil is a descriptive term given to the action of a sentient being moving its will away from some good, and that is all it is.  In this sense, it is right to say evil is a negation, like ugliness or deformation.  Consider a man who is ugly: the source of the deformation is not the molecules in his body, which he shares with a beautiful woman, but the lack of beauty in his form.  In a similar fashion, evil is not located in some thing, as its being or essence, but in the move of a free being’s will against some good end.

When I was writing my thesis, I got enveloped in a fascinating book by Gordon Corera that detailed inside experience in MI6.  The book Art of Betrayal is excellent, and while being in some degree an “establishment” book, it is still amazing in what it admits.  From MKULTRA to Soviet intrigue, what is most interesting is what I outlined above: there is an art to betrayal, which in effect makes the real modus operandi of the modern world system closer to what one sees in Melville’s lesser classic Confidence Man.  In Confidence Man a crowd of various individuals take a steamboat ride down the Mississippi and encounter the confidence man himself, the devil.  In the novel each character is forced to confront the thing in which they place their trust with the possibility of it being a fraud.  The reader is also expected to question his own presuppositions.  While this novel can be placed in the existentialist strand, it is also a great example of how the network of intelligence agencies that run the plant for the megabanks and mega corporations works.   As Corera’s book title explains, they are confidence men (and women) who are the masters of the art of betrayal.

Gordon Corera's fascinating book, "The Art of Betrayal."

Gordon Corera’s fascinating book, “The Art of Betrayal.”

How does this relate to the metaphysical speculations on evil?  All three elements listed in the title are connected: evil, intrigue and the left, in terms of deception.  When the leftist attacks objective truth under the guise of arguing against it, they are presupposing the very thing they are attacking: logic.  When the Eastern philosopher rejects logic with its reasoning, they are doing the same.  When evil seeks to be irrational, it is being in a sense rational.  When the left seeks to remove structures and institutions, it does so with the erection of a new structure and hierarchy.  This is not to say tha the “right” has cornered the market on truth and lack of deception.  But the key factor the right has in its favor is the firm belief in objective truth and reason.  For this reason, it opposes the state’s monopoly on power in instances where the state seeks to muddle the populace into slobbering retardation for the purpose of easier management.  In these cases the state becomes god incarnate with a relativistic, trendy hipster idiot population submitting to its whims.  So when the skeptic approaches the actual functioning of the world and doubts “conspiracy,” they should take a look at it from the perspective of what intelligence operatives write in their mainstream books or from the perspective of Machiavelli and Melville.   For a “leftist skeptic” to admit that there is large-scale nefarious conspiring requires the leftist to inadvertently reexamine his presuppositions.  For that to be the case, it would mean that there is truth and there are objective standards – the very thing the authoritarian leftist cannot admit, except for his own dogmatic standard.


JaysAnalysis Audio – Overview of Plato’s “Crito”

0
0

This talk picks up from the previous Platonic discussions with Socrates’ reasonings behind accepting death in the dialogue, “Crito.” Issues such as reason, epistemology and authority are covered. This discussion is geared for an introductory to mid-level audience.

If you like what you hear, check out JaysAnalysis.com and subscribe by Paypal for more content for a miniscule fraction of the price of a statist education – $4.95



Jay w Tim Kelly: Bilderberg, Plato and Economic Nominalism

0
0

Tim Kelly invited me back to discuss the history of Bilderberg and the neo-classical economic theory in light of the trek of western philosophical thought. From the transition out of Platonic methexis into Aristotelian hylomorphism, the economic sphere reflects this nominalism in its free trade and market perspectives over time. Corporatocracy is the death of history and culture and the end of ethnoi. The conversation concludes with the co-opting of libertarianism and “natural rights” philosophy.

MP3 here.

Tim Kelly is a former policy advisor, freelance writer and political cartoonist, is married and has been blessed with six children. His podcast can be found here.


JaysAnalysis Audio: Republic Bk. V – Secrets of the Elite (Half)

0
0

In one of the most astounding works of the history of Western Literature, Plato’s Republic Book V details one of the deepest secrets of the elite and how it relates to mathematical mysteries.  In this free half of the audio I touch on one of the deepest secrets in all of political history, and decode its relationship to the mysteries of numerology and the ideational realm of the forms.  This is the free half of the paid lecture subscribers get full access to for $4.95 a month at the PayPal link to the right. Previous free talks on the Republic can be found here.


Non Serviam – Anarchism as a Dialectical Subversion Tool

0
0
Lucifer, post-banishment.

Lucifer, post-banishment.

By: Jay Dyer

The appeal of anarchism is understandable, especially in our day of what seems to be spectacular corruption on the part of members of the establishment.  In the online-fueled furor of Ron Paul’s libertarian surge in 2008, those left hanging in the wake of Campaign for Liberty’s ability to change nothing were looking for more.  And, after the failure of the libertarian surge to obtain anything from Rand Paul, the Daily Paul types clicked and googled around to find names like Larken Rose or Adam Kokesh (and now Ken O’Keefe – and his veganism!), arguing the necessity of political logic dictated the “small state” position was not enough.

In fact, the problem was precisely the state itself – something to be obliterated to bring about the long sought freedom of the individual.  Seeing the absurdity of the left/right dialectic in American so-called politics, this line of reasoning has a semblance of wisdom about it, yet, in my view, still operates under the guise of a number of absurd presuppositions and flaws that leave anarcho-libertarian fellow travelers well-prepared for the next stage of carnival troupe honey pot duping to coming along.  Since the online trend of “anarchism” seems to be on the rise, and since many ask if I am an anarchist, I want to offer my analysis.  As we shall see (and as Chris Kendall of Hoax Buster’s has perceptively noted, these movements appear to be intended to steer followers in a certain direction – yes, even anarchism).

Anarchism cannot be separated from its historical milieu, which, depending on how far back one wants to go, can extend back to the origins of revolutionary movements in general (in the West), to the Franciscan spiritualist movement of Joachim of Fiore, whose bizarre metaphysical historicization of the Trinity predicted a coming “Age of the Holy Spirit,” characterized by an age of revival, piety and communal poverty, ushering in some version or preliminary stage of the eschaton.  From there, medieval gnostic movements (which I have analyzed here) carried on the revolutionary fervor, up to the Munzter Rebellion in Germany), into the radical vision of the Jacobins in France.  However, what all these movements shared in common was their communal, collectivist aspects.  The supposed revelation of the individual’s atomistic liberty was something yet to be seen (so the mythology goes).

Concurrent with these religious, political and social movements, was a tremendous revolution in the realm of thought – the Renaissance, Reformation, Enlightenment and Scientific Revolution, all of which were reflected in the revolutionary political and social zeitgeist.  The Declaration of Human-

Erroneous Latin Trinitarian image portraying the divine essence as the unifying "God," subordinating Persons to the generic modanic principle. This philosophy has been the source of western dialectical tensions.

Erroneous Latin Trinitarian image portraying the divine essence as the unifying “God,” subordinating Persons to the generic modanic principle. This philosophy has been the source of western dialectical tensions.   See  God, History, and Dialectic by: Dr. Joseph P. Farrell

Rights (a Masonic document) of the French Revolutionaries purported to offer a list of “natural rights” accorded to the individual, and from Rousseau’s notion of the “moral centrality of freedom” arose modern anarchism.  Simultaneous with these developments were also their dialectical opposite – radical collectivism, such as is found in Hobbes’ Leviathan or Hegel’s Elements of the Philosophy of the Right (where the state is the march of God on earth).  As I wrote previously on this matter – equally applicable here:

“Even the Hermetica and the Egyptian accounts from the Memphite narrative, for example, include the idea that creation was spoken into existence by virtue of a divine Logos, yet ultimately, even in the Egyptian narrative, the overall principle, the ultimate Absolute, is not personal,

but an immaterial force.  Thus, at the outset, we are presented with only two possible options for this question – is the Absolute ultimately (supra)rational and personal, or is the Absolute ultimately an impersonal, chaotic force?  There are only two possibilities here, and once we consider this basic philosophical question, we can extrapolate Darwinism as clearly a manifestation of the second.   Though most Darwinian adherents would be at pains to insist there is no ultimate guiding principle, the worldview still tends towards the notion of Forces of Nature determining.  This determination, however, is ultimately irrational and impersonal, aside from the appearance of order, telos and design. (Note that I am not making a classical teleological argument, but a transcendental version of a teleological argument.)

But there are many, many more problems for positing ultimate reality or the Absolute as an impersonal force.  If ultimate reality is impersonal and chaotic, then all localized events, phenomena and objects are also devoid of any ultimate meaning.  Language, mathematics, logic, etc., are thus also annihilated as merely mental fictions, or at best some cosmic force we do not yet understand (yet still impersonal!).  These servants of chaos and abyss are like a cartoon character, sawing off the limb he’s sitting on, to spite his opponent.  If ultimate reality is impersonal, then the thread that links all facts, ideas, objects, patterns, etc., is not real. It is a fiction of man’s chaotic, impersonal mental chemical reactions.  There is no order or pattern actually out there in external reality, and the so-called regularity of nature upon which science is built, induction, is merely a mental projection or interpretation.”

And, as I’ve argued at length many times, these are manifestations of the central problem of western philosophy – dialectical tension.  For the revolutionaries and anarchists, the salvation and redemption of man’s temporal welfare must come through the radical independence of the many, thus the much hyped “voluntarism” principle of not impeding or infringing the “liberty” of another.  Defined in political philosophy as negative liberty, the position offers no positive statements or understanding of what man is, what liberty is, or what these metaphysical claims imply (since it is based in the anti-metaphysics of the period), resolving itself to bare slogans and naïve atheism, generally.

British East India Company Flag.

British East India Company Flag.

Of course, as I’ve pointed out many times, the notion of “freedom” presupposes a lot of metaphysics that must be justified, given the generally atheistic and materialist stance of most “anarchists.”  Seeking the solutions for  man’s ills in external and environmental factors, it is precisely the inner man anarchism misses, given that slavery is not merely an external phenomenon.  Denying all notions of external authority, anarchism, like Gnosticism, socialism, communism, fascism, etc., the man’s problems are all relegated to some externally imposed order, be it the demiurge, king, slave owner or corporate kleptocrat.  Yet, having rejected all forms of authority (and generally God as the true authority), it follows that man’s ills can only be solved externally.  Since man is a temporal, higher animal of sorts, the best that can be afforded him is the most pleasurable physical state.  Here anarchism is intimately tied to the Laissez Faire “free market” scheme of Ricardo and Smith.  (Ironically, these Scottish “Enlightenment” philosophers so hailed by fans of the revolutions are precisely the causes of the ideology behind our globo-corporate-superstate that dominates in our day.)

For “freedom” to be sensible, “man” as a concept has to have meaning and there must be some ground for believing in his “dignity” and “rights.”  Who or what grants these “rights”? Nature?  But nature demonstrates predators and prey, often with the weaker prey becoming the means by which the “fitter” members of the animal kingdom survive.  Is that “natural” for human relations?  On what basis does an anarchist (since 99% of them are atheistic, agnostic or materialists) derive these “rights”?   Given that there is no God, why should any other being be bound by your anarchic voluntarism principle?  At this point, the debate always devolves into the utilitarian “happiness principle,” by which we are magically supposed to a priori divine this universal maxim to somehow be so.  Yet, what if the maximum quality pleasure I receive by enslaving another far exceeds the quantity of pleasure accrued by those who are not enslaved?   On what basis does utilitarian ethics (long debunked as philosophic nonsense) determine between these two options – quality or quantity of “pleasure”?  One need only look to the laughable attempts of the British utilitarians like Bentham to concoct a hedonic calculation to measure it!

anarchism_defined_by_ztk2006-d3j3ga4

Sloganeering.

In a Spenglerian sense, it is also ironic that these philosophies have already come and gone, much like Dawkins’ bad arguments against theism are rehashes of 17th century empiricist responses to equally bad “classical” apologetical arguments from Thomism, these philosophies have already come, exited the historical stage and morphed into their more logical consequences (in the case of revolutionary philosophies, they have mutated into post-modernism, deconstructionism, nihilism, etc.).  The naivety of these persons is evident in just this fact, given that political philosophies, like ancient civilizations and states, come and go, and will never come again.  One can no more raise the actual Roman Empire in its imperial prowess than resurrect any 17th century philosophy that has already died.  The reason this cannot be done is because the logic or spirit of such movements have already had their growth, in their day, into their logical consequences.  Ideologies, like worldviews of individuals, work themselves out to become more and more consistent with their foundational presuppositions.

Played like a fiddle.

Played like a fiddle.

In the case of anarchism, the non serviam principle has thus worked itself out in the world historical as a purely negative principle, in its most extreme sense.  Offering no positive philosophy or statement of anthropology or the human psyche and nous (and as the presuppositional ground of those, God Himself), human ethics and aesthetics (beyond empty phrases like “liberty”), anarchism is an empty philosophy.  Not only is it vacuous, it is also historically a weaponized philosophy, along with its revolutionary cousins, engineered for the weakening of some rival state by some a foreign power.  Lest anyone doubt that, note that anarchism in our day is now being tied to the intensely zealous fanaticism of veganism. Indeed, this example proves my point about what philosophy calls “epistemological self-consciousness,” that the principles of “liberty” and “voluntarism” are trying to work themselves out into being more consistent: If we should not violently impede the liberty and well-being of our fellow-man, we should not impede the liberty of our Darwinian ancestors, the dear animals.  Toefler, in his globalist texts concerning the coming third wave era of technocracy, even states the necessity of vegan propagandism for the success of the new world order.

Might there be an anarchist who believes that they don’t have to be consistent with their beliefs or that nothing else is implied in their maxim of “No state”? Sure. My point is rather a reductio argument that there is no reason beyond personal whim or ad hoc claim as to why we should not consider the family or any other grouping to also be a tyranny (especially when 99% of the time anarchism is based on the same atomism or materialism of a Hobbes or a Bakunin).  The point is dielectical – both Enlightenment offspring – collectivism or anarchism are just placing the one and the many in tension.  Ironically, the classical theorists of both collectivism and anarchism all discuss their metaphysic!  For an insight into the irony of the anti-metaphysical position’s obsession with metaphysics, consider the following:

“Bakunin’s philosophy, one that combines the logic of negative dialectics with an ontology of evolutionary naturalism. Like Murray Bookchin, the philosophy that Bakunin expressed in embryonic form can perhaps best be described as dialectical naturalism. This philosophy is not a crude form of mechanistic materialism; something that is completely lost on his theological detractors in “Freedom”.”

Illustrating the usage of these ideologies by bigger power blocs, students of The Great Game such as myself are well aware of the case of Joseph Conrad’s hints about MI6 and the use of anarchism in his famous novel, The Secret Agent.  Michelle Steinberg comments:

Conrad’s story, though a work of fiction, is rooted in a real incident, the bungled bombing of the Royal Observatory in Greenwich Park, London in 1894, according to Martin Seymour-Smith, who wrote an Introduction in 1984 to one Penguin edition of The Secret Agent. According to Seymour-Smith, the facts behind the real incident, known as the “Greenwich Bomb Outrage,” were these:

Revelation of the method.

Revelation of the method.

“A young man called Martial Bourdin was found in Greenwich Park, on a hill near the Royal Observatory `in a kneeling posture, terribly mutilated’ on the evening of 15 February 1894. There had been an explosion; Bourdin had set it off, and in so doing had killed himself. He had blown off one of his hands, and his guts were spilling from his body; he died in hospital very soon afterwards. . . . Bourdin had a brother-in-law called H.B. Samuels, who edited an anarchist paper. Samuels was in fact, like Verloc [the main character in Conrad’s book], a police agent and, again like Verloc, he accompanied his not very intelligent dupe to the park. Bourdin . . . in some way set off the explosive he was carrying, which was supplied by Samuels, acting as agent provocateur. . . . Anarchists were not responsible for the Greenwich Bomb incident; they were as frightened about it as they are in The Secret Agent.

Anarchism, and all members of the revolutionary philosophy family, are grounded on the notion of the metaphysical primacy of the many, over the one.  Whereas most statist philosophies like Plato’s Republic, for example, sees the mass as the body of a vast man embodied in the figure of the head as king, emperor or philosopher-ruler, so in dialectical opposition the anarchist principle sees some magical metaphysical primacy in the many.  Ironically, even number theory itself shows there is no qualitative primacy given to “one” over “many,” as 1 possesses just as much “numberness” as 2, 3, 4, etc.  In Orthodox Trinitarian philosophy, the one and the many have always been viewed as balanced, based on the equality of Persons in the Godhead.  Thus, in the Church, the bishop is as much a bishop as any other, with no super-God-bishop (the papacy) to trump the rest.  The point is this – good philosophy is based on good theology, where there is a balance of the principle of the one and the many.  This is reflected in both religious and political life. Anarchism, with no divine authority in revelation or the supernatural, can only offer competing human opinions, leading to never-ending fracturing and disintegration.

The Double-headed Eagle is an ancient Orthodox Christian Symbol, not a Masonic one. The two heads symbolize Church and State in unison, symphonia.

The Double-headed Eagle is an ancient Orthodox Christian Symbol of Byzantium and Russia, not a Masonic one. The two heads symbolize Church and State in unison, symphonia.

Likewise, in Orthodox Imperial praxis embodied in the symphonia, the State worked in harmonia with the Church, each in their proper sphere.  In this philosophy, the Emperor was divinely appointed and a real authority, fulfilling the Old Testament prophecies in Isaiah that kings and rulers would convert to serve the Messiah.  The Messianic Age does not, you’ll note, result in anarchism.   Anarchism is based on the presupposition of non serviam, and in praxis, non serviam results in the wiping out of all metaphysical categories and groupings, including tribe, family, race and gender.  Are these metaphysical impositions not also “tyrannies” of the demiurge that must be transcended, since they limit “freedom”?   Indeed, for the outworking of revolutionary philosophies, including anarchism, one need only look at the political ad social discourse of our day, where the need to become post-human (transhumanism) is manifestly the logical outcome of anarchism and her revolutionary cousins.  Naïve dupes, the online libertarian pacifist anarcho-Cheeto puff keyboard slappers’ desire for non serviam is ironic, given they are likely being played by think tanks and intelligence agents.

 


(Half) JaysAnalysis: Plato’s Republic Conclusion – The Ancient Mysteries

0
0

In this free first hour, we recap and review Plato’s Republic, and conclude the analysis with a look at the final book of the Republic, Book X, and its description of the afterlife in the esoteric “Myth of Er.” In hour 2 for paid subscribers, I explain the mystery religions, including Orphism and the Eleusinian Mysteries and their connection to Plato and how this is altered in Plato’s later reformation of the Republic into “Magnesia,” with its Nocturnal Council in The Laws, as well as the connection to cymatics and the universe as music. The full talk can be obtained by subscribing to JaysAnalysis for 4.95 at the PayPal link.

Subscribe to JaysAnalysis for more by clicking on this image!

Subscribe to JaysAnalysis for more by clicking on this image!

JaysAnalysis Podcast now on iTunes! Click the image.  JaysAnalysis offers the first hour for free and the full talks and interviews as a subscription below.

For full talks and lectures, subscribe to JaysAnalysis on PayPal here.

 

Purchase my book, Esoteric Hollywood by clicking the image!

Purchase my book, Esoteric Hollywood by clicking the image!

JaysAnalysis on Stitcher:

stitcher-banner-300x250

 

Order Hollywood Mind Control by Jamie Hanshaw here!

Order Hollywood Mind Control by Jamie Hanshaw here!


Neo-cons are Trotskyites – How the System Perpetuates Faux Democracy (Vid)

0
0

A fact lost on many.

Purchase my book here.

patreon-become-my-patron

follow_twitterFollow_us_on_Facebookyoutube-subscribe-button-psd-photoshop-july-2013

To support my work, become a member at JaysAnalysis for 4.95 a month, or 60.00 a year, for my full talks and interviews, as well as purchasing my book, Esoteric Hollywood at the links at the site.

Subscribe to JaysAnalysis for more by clicking on this image!

Subscribe to JaysAnalysis for more by clicking on this image!

JaysAnalysis Podcast now on iTunes! Click the image.  JaysAnalysis offers the first hour for free and the full talks and interviews as a subscription below.

For full talks and lectures, subscribe to JaysAnalysis on PayPal here.

Purchase my book, Esoteric Hollywood by clicking the image!

JaysAnalysis on Stitcher:

stitcher-banner-300x250


CIA/Color Revolutions, Rand Corp. Swarming & Minority Report Analysis – Jay Dyer

0
0

“The goal of modern propaganda is no longer to transform opinion but to arouse an active and mythical belief”-Jacques Ellul.”

Stream or download episode here

Season 2, Hoax Busters Call. All new season, all new episodes!

Ft. Lauderdale Shooting (Alleged), Esoteric Hollywood-Minority Report Analysis, Technocratic Takeover, Cashless Society, The Rise of the Cashless City, RAND Corporation Swarming Mobs of Adolescents, Color Revolutions, Pussy Riot, Weather Underground,Network(film), Brookings Institute’s Libya’s Test of the New International Order, Syrian Girl, Alexander Dugin, The Alt Right, Andy Nowicki.

Purchase my book here.

patreon-become-my-patron

follow_twitterFollow_us_on_Facebookyoutube-subscribe-button-psd-photoshop-july-2013

To support my work, become a member at JaysAnalysis for 4.95 a month, or 60.00 a year, for my full talks and interviews, as well as purchasing my book, Esoteric Hollywood at the links at the site.

Subscribe to JaysAnalysis for more by clicking on this image!

Subscribe to JaysAnalysis for more by clicking on this image!

JaysAnalysis Podcast now on iTunes! Click the image.  JaysAnalysis offers the first hour for free and the full talks and interviews as a subscription below.

For full talks and lectures, subscribe to JaysAnalysis on PayPal here.

Purchase my book, Esoteric Hollywood by clicking the image!

JaysAnalysis on Stitcher:

stitcher-banner-300x250

 


Jay Dyer Vs. Adam Kokesh Debate Tonight: “State or No State?”

0
0

Jay Dyer versus Adam Kokesh in a 2 hour formal setting of position, response, on the hosted by Spearhead Transmissions, Live-Streamed on YouTube.com and Audio via Alternate Current Radio Network.

Stream or download full audio here.

Purchase my book here.

patreon-become-my-patron

follow_twitterFollow_us_on_Facebookyoutube-subscribe-button-psd-photoshop-july-2013

To support my work, become a member at JaysAnalysis for 4.95 a month, or 60.00 a year, for my full talks and interviews, as well as purchasing my book, Esoteric Hollywood at the links at the site.

Subscribe to JaysAnalysis for more by clicking on this image!

Subscribe to JaysAnalysis for more by clicking on this image!

JaysAnalysis Podcast now on iTunes! Click the image.  JaysAnalysis offers the first hour for free and the full talks and interviews as a subscription below.

For full talks and lectures, subscribe to JaysAnalysis on PayPal here.

new-ad

JaysAnalysis on Stitcher:

stitcher-banner-300x250

 



Adam Kokesh and Jay Dyer Debate the State (FULL DEBATE HERE)

0
0

Jay Dyer versus Adam Kokesh in a 2 hour formal setting of position, response, on the hosted by Spearhead Transmissions, Live-Streamed on YouTube.com and Audio via Alternate Current Radio Network.

Stream or download full audio here.

Purchase my book here.

patreon-become-my-patron

follow_twitterFollow_us_on_Facebookyoutube-subscribe-button-psd-photoshop-july-2013

To support my work, become a member at JaysAnalysis for 4.95 a month, or 60.00 a year, for my full talks and interviews, as well as purchasing my book, Esoteric Hollywood at the links at the site.

Subscribe to JaysAnalysis for more by clicking on this image!

Subscribe to JaysAnalysis for more by clicking on this image!

JaysAnalysis Podcast now on iTunes! Click the image.  JaysAnalysis offers the first hour for free and the full talks and interviews as a subscription below.

For full talks and lectures, subscribe to JaysAnalysis on PayPal here.

new-ad

JaysAnalysis on Stitcher:

stitcher-banner-300x250

 


JaysAnalysis: Refuting Anarchism, Marxism & All Revolutionary Thought (Half)

0
0

Reflecting on the debate with Adam Kokesh and briefly replying to the hit piece written about me by a pathological skeptic, I give my response and launch into a lengthier critique of all modern revolutionary thought.   This critique analyzes the assumptions of all modern liberal (nominalist) positions, from Marxism to anarchism to fascism.  In hour two for subscribers I do a presuppositional critique of the nonsensical, somewhat famous essay of Umberto Eco on how to identify “fascism,” titled “Ur-Fascism.”   Many topics are covered, from Descartes to logical fallacies and meta-logic.  To hear the full lecture, subscribe at the PayPal links below.

Stream or Download the First Half Here

Purchase my book here.

patreon-become-my-patron

follow_twitterFollow_us_on_Facebookyoutube-subscribe-button-psd-photoshop-july-2013

To support my work, become a member at JaysAnalysis for 4.95 a month, or 60.00 a year, for my full talks and interviews, as well as purchasing my book, Esoteric Hollywood at the links at the site.

Subscribe to JaysAnalysis for more by clicking on this image!

Subscribe to JaysAnalysis for more by clicking on this image!

JaysAnalysis Podcast now on iTunes! Click the image.  JaysAnalysis offers the first hour for free and the full talks and interviews as a subscription below.

For full talks and lectures, subscribe to JaysAnalysis on PayPal here.

new-ad

JaysAnalysis on Stitcher:

stitcher-banner-300x250

 

Order Hollywood Mind Control by Jamie Hanshaw here!


Jay Dyer’s Lecture Series on Plato’s Republic (Free Halves)

0
0
Subscribe for 4.95 a month or 60.00 per year for the full talks and lectures.

Subscribe for 4.95 a month or 60.00 per year at the PayPal links for full talks and lectures.

In this popular series from last year, I covered the entire book of Plato’s monumental Republic.  Arguably the most influential philosophy text of all time, the Republic demonstrates a city and state governed by the mystical and esoteric doctrines of Platonism and Pythagoreanism.  In these lectures, full subscribers get access to the full content MP3s.

Lecture 1: Bks. I-II Magical Rings and Secret Societies, YouTube Here – Half MP3 Here

Lecture 2: BK. III Music and Triadic Hierarchy: Subscription Only.

Lecture 3: BK. IV The Apollonian Mysteries, The Ideal State & Eugenics: Subscription Only

Lecture 4: Bk. V Secrets of the Elite – Half YouTube Here – Half MP3 Here 

Lecture 5: Bk. VI The Noetic Light of the Intelligible Sun – Half YouTube – Half MP3 Audio

Lecture 6: Bk. VII – Allegory of the Cave – Subscription Only.

Lecture 7: Bk. VIII – The Pythagorean City – Half YouTube Here

Lecture 8: Bks. IX-X – The Ancient Mysteries and Republic Overview – Subscription Only

Purchase my book here.

patreon-become-my-patron

follow_twitterFollow_us_on_Facebookyoutube-subscribe-button-psd-photoshop-july-2013

To support my work, become a member at JaysAnalysis for 4.95 a month, or 60.00 a year, for my full talks and interviews, as well as purchasing my book, Esoteric Hollywood at the links at the site.

Subscribe to JaysAnalysis for more by clicking on this image!

Subscribe to JaysAnalysis for more by clicking on this image!

JaysAnalysis Podcast now on iTunes! Click the image.  JaysAnalysis offers the first hour for free and the full talks and interviews as a subscription below.

For full talks and lectures, subscribe to JaysAnalysis on PayPal here.

new-ad

JaysAnalysis on Stitcher:

stitcher-banner-300x250

 

Order Hollywood Mind Control by Jamie Hanshaw here!

 

 

 

 


Fake News Madness Sale! Sunday Wire: Jay Dyer & Patrick Henningsen

0
0

Jay Dyer, Hesher and Patrick Henningsen cover the 21stCenturyWire Fake News Week, highlighting the MSM’s greater hits of total retardo deception and madman nonsense.

Stream or Download Here

 

Purchase my book here.

patreon-become-my-patron

follow_twitterFollow_us_on_Facebookyoutube-subscribe-button-psd-photoshop-july-2013

To support my work, become a member at JaysAnalysis for 4.95 a month, or 60.00 a year, for my full talks and interviews, as well as purchasing my book, Esoteric Hollywood at the links at the site.

Subscribe to JaysAnalysis for more by clicking on this image!

Subscribe to JaysAnalysis for more by clicking on this image!

JaysAnalysis Podcast now on iTunes! Click the image.  JaysAnalysis offers the first hour for free and the full talks and interviews as a subscription below.

For full talks and lectures, subscribe to JaysAnalysis on PayPal here.

new-ad

JaysAnalysis on Stitcher:

stitcher-banner-300x250

 

Order Hollywood Mind Control by Jamie Hanshaw here!


Behind Flynn’s Removal: The Deep State War Against Trump, Russia & Sovereign Nations

0
0

Jay Dyer is a public speaker, lecturer, comedian and author of Esoteric Hollywood: Sex, Cults and Symbols in Film, as well as the host of the JaysAnalysis Podcast/Esoteric Hollywood. He is also a regular contributor to 21stCenturyWire, Soul of the East and the Espionage History Archive. Jay’s work covers a wide variety of subjects, including metaphysics, film analysis, theology, geopolitics, literature, and history.

Jay returns to Red Ice once again for a very timely conversation on current events, globalism, the deep state, and more. We begin by discussing the recent political assassination of Michael Flynn. Jay explains that there is an internal conflict within the deep state; one faction supports globalism, whereas the other supports nationalism. This leads to a closer look at what the deep state really is, and how Trump threatens this shadowy power structure. Later, we discuss fascism, which has been used as a bogeyman to scare people from tradition, natural order and hierarchy. Our show concludes with a few thoughts on the future of the Alt-Right.

Stream or Download Here

RELEVANT LINKS

jaysanalysis.com
Ur-Fascism
Globalism Is the Victory of Western Ideals

Purchase my book here.

patreon-become-my-patron

follow_twitterFollow_us_on_Facebookyoutube-subscribe-button-psd-photoshop-july-2013

To support my work, become a member at JaysAnalysis for 4.95 a month, or 60.00 a year, for my full talks and interviews, as well as purchasing my book, Esoteric Hollywood at the links at the site.

Subscribe to JaysAnalysis for more by clicking on this image!

Subscribe to JaysAnalysis for more by clicking on this image!

JaysAnalysis Podcast now on iTunes! Click the image.  JaysAnalysis offers the first hour for free and the full talks and interviews as a subscription below.

For full talks and lectures, subscribe to JaysAnalysis on PayPal here.

new-ad

JaysAnalysis on Stitcher:

stitcher-banner-300x250

 

Order Hollywood Mind Control by Jamie Hanshaw here!


Viewing all 34 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images